Search for: "State v. Parris"
Results 141 - 160
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
" We're talking Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm
Consider Sackett v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15] The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16] It is… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet ALDF v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
Parry, [1963] 2 W.L.R. 846). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
The oral argument (transcript here) in the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:26 pm
Parry, 2008 BCSC 1397 at ¶37. 2. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
Meanwhile, over in Strasbourg… A complaint of a very different type of discrimination, the refusal of a European Convention state to allow same-sex couples to marry, was recently decided by the Strasbourg Court in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:59 am
The recent case of Cacchiotti v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
(Parris may also care to reflect that a [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
(Parris may also care to reflect that a [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Parry would be entitled may be, under Federal court decisions, a matter dependent upon the resolution of the state court matrimonial action. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Parry would be entitled may be, under Federal court decisions, a matter dependent upon the resolution of the state court matrimonial action. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
In the Times, Matthew Parris complains that Lord Puttnam “has led a sneak attack to sabotage the Defamation Bill and get statutory regulation by the back door“. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
Supreme Court's consideration of the issues presented in the Trump v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:12 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas &… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
