Search for: "State v. Persons "
Results 141 - 160
of 84,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2014, 8:56 am
Oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Elmi: [2011] EWCA Civ 1403; [2011] WLR (D) 353 “A person from abroad who had ticked a form at a job centre to confirm she was seeking work and then applied for income support satisfied the requirement in article 7(3)(c) of the Citizens Direction that she was registered as a job seeker and was entitled to income support.” WLR Daily, 18th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:50 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; [2008] WLR (D) 86 “A direct payment of carer's allowance made to a disabled person for securing the provision of care by her husband formed part of the husband's earnings for the purposes of assessing his entitlement to income support. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
HJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HT v Same ú [2010] UKSC 31; [2010] WLR (D) 174 “To reject a gay person’s claim for refugee status on the ground that, if returned to his home country, he could avoid persecution by living discreetly would be to deny his right, protected by the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, to live freely and openly as himself without fear of persecution. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
Why do people look to the mental states of person rather than the outcomes the person produces? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
INS v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
State, No. 1042, September Term, 1996 (filed April 4, 1997) (affirming judgments of conviction); State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm
Olsen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Byrd v United States, 584 U. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:25 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 696; [2010] WLR (D) 152 “Where a person who had been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a year or more appealed against the refusal of his claim for asylum under s 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 he was entitled, by virtue of the principle of equivalence under Community law, to include the refusal of his claim for humanitarian protection in the… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
