Search for: "State v. Register" Results 141 - 160 of 13,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
” Which is strongly reminiscent of the situation in MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam), in which the couple only found out that their religious ceremony had been defective when JA went to the Register Office to obtain a marriage certificate and was told that their marriage had not been registered. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:48 am by Kalvis Golde
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all states. [read post]
Ortovox v Mammut  The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by DLA Piper LLP
IA-6368 (Aug. 23, 2023) (the Adopting Release) available at https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2023/ia-6383.pdf.[2] National Association of Private Fund Managers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm by CFM Admin
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
They argued that because their form of offering was not specifically enumerated by statute, it did not need to be registered.[7] Sound familiar? [read post]