Search for: "State v. Richer" Results 141 - 160 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Justice Quince is asking the right questions   In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:54 pm by davidmginsberg
It is not a partisan opinion that (i) George Bush ran the country for 8 years (and until three years ago); (ii) Democrats can not pass effective legislation to solve the budged deficit because they need (and don’t have)60% of the vote in the Senate to avoid filibusters (which Republicans do to get their way); (iii) Democrats can not pass effective legislation to solve the budget deficit because the Republicans control the house of Representatives; (iv) under his administration, Bush greatly… [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:05 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Decker’s “Employment Agreement” stated that Decker would be compensated with a salary and bonus equal to 10% of KONG’s net profit. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
  Yet today, they frequently inflame inequalities and entrench divisions: Richer countries hoarded COVID vaccines while the pandemic ran rampant in the Global South. . . [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am by Ryan Goodman
” On her first day in office, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued this memorandum stating that “State and local actors may not impede, obstruct, or otherwise fail to comply with lawful immigration-related directives pursuant to the President's Article II authority to ensure national security, the Immigration and Nationality Act, or other authorities. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]