Search for: "State v. S. D. M." Results 141 - 160 of 9,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Indeed, in most states (say, Alabama), I'm very confident that the state supreme court would literally laugh out loud at the mere mention of any such claim.So in that way, California is, I suspect, no outlier.But here's where we're different.First, there's a dissent. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
Supp. 544 (D.D.C 1960), aff’d, 293 F.2d 157 (D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Anyway, I'm not an expert in this New York law, and if readers or others have specific portions they take issue with, I'd be very interested to hear it. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m going to start by going back to some earlier cases, Two Pesos v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I:342–44) In fact, Wilson’s deeply anti-Semitic outside adviser Colonel Edward M. [read post]