Search for: "State v. Santos"
Results 141 - 160
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm
In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
Under these standards, the court said that it could not say that the supervisor’s testimony did not support the findings of guilt and declined to disturb the Board’s determinations.As to the penalties imposed, the court said that much deference is to be afforded to an agency’s determination regarding a sanction, especially in situations where, as here, matters of internal discipline in a law enforcement organization are concerned, quoting from Santos v Chesworth,… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
" This video game takes place in the fictional city "Los Santos," which itself is in a fictional American state of "San Andreas. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:13 pm
See Middelkamp; Dos Santos v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
Petitioner Williane Rodrigues Dos Santos Argueta is a Brazilian citizen. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
’” Santos added that Kahler v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:13 pm
" Santos, 403 F.3d at 1125-26; see also United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:56 pm
Against this rather bleak backdrop comes the low-profile case of Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:14 am
Santos, No. 06-1005. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 10:41 am
Last week, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in EMOI Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
Santos (06-1005), and August 23 in Medellin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm
Yu, 2015 BCSC 670 and Dos Santos (Committee of) v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:59 pm
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Recently, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:53 am
Readers may recall the decision in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
