Search for: "State v. Schuster"
Results 141 - 160
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2012, 5:55 am
Schuster v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A federal judge must still approve the proposal, but three ebook publishers have offered to kick in a total of $69 million to settle an antitrust suit that alleges they attempted to fix ebook prices.Attorneys general of 54 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:10 pm
Schuster and Carrie J. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The government took issue with suggestions that the consent decree was either too “regulatory” in nature and therefore overbroad or too vague so that it was unenforceable.The Justice Department concluded that both opposing and supporting comments had at least one element in common: they agreed that entry of the decree likely will reduce retail prices for e-books, at least in the short term.The consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
Simon & Schuster Cellphone Spam Violates TCPA--Joffe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
United States consumers were harmed economically, in that the higher prices charged were part of $300 million in retail sales from the five publishers, including $40 million for e-books licensed through Apple’s iBookstore. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:19 pm
The 56-page complaint in State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
Div. 1990)); State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:30 pm
Simon and Schuster, the court says that plaintiffs’ allegations are sufficient to state a claim under the TCPA. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
See Jones, 29 F.3d at 830 (finding that the defendants, who were employees of a state agency, were in privity with that state agency, which was the defendant in the first action); see also Schuster v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:18 am
” [Ken, Popehat] “Why Mitt Romney likes firing people” [Suzanne Lucas] Free speech and union dues: Tim Sandefur on the oral argument in Knox v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:58 pm
Simon & Schuster" "Cellphone Spam Violates TCPA--Joffe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343, 358–59 (2003) (quoting R.A.V.); Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
The Walker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:08 am
: critical reflections on the status of irregular migrants in Europe and the United States edited by Marie-Be? [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court eventually struck down the New York law in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
