Search for: "State v. Short Bull"
Results 141 - 160
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
This means, in short, that a member state is not at liberty to introduce welfare measures that hinder the free movement of livestock across EU borders, or, as the CJEU says in terms: numerical standards relating to the minimum internal height of compartments, such as those laid down by [the Danish legislation], must be proportionate to the objective of protecting animals during transport and must not go beyond what is necessary to achieve it. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
"In short, there is an ongoing, continued, and systemic displacement of the States and dislocation of the federal structure. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
The short Easter legal term began on Tuesday 30 April 2019 and ends 4½ weeks later on 24 May 2019. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am
In short, the Convention supports a qualified speciesism which builds upon a responsible anthropocentrism. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
(Lawyers: remember Raffles v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 9:46 am
The Scientific Board • Pr. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:29 pm
Malone v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
The short Easter Legal Term ended on 28 May 2021, and the Trinity Legal Term will begin on 8 June 2021. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Short of a trial on the merits, there could be additional motions for summary judgment, but there might also be a settlement.POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT REVIEW Barring a prompt resolution of the dispute by settlement, however, there is a good chance that the case will first be taken to the Texas Supreme Court, and if the high court agrees to hear it, it is likely that one or more of the legal issues might get decided differently by the court that has the last word on matters of Texas… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
But what about finding state powers in the constitutional text such as a bloated conception of state sovereignty that simply cannot bear its own weight? [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
., Brown Shoe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
You can also visit my website for free information and short instructional videos at www.micreditlawyer.com. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
In short, we hold that the developer must arbitrate its claims against the general contractor but not its claims against the other defendants. [read post]
