Search for: "State v. Silva"
Results 141 - 160
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
In Silva v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Silvas v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:09 am
Justice Action Center, Aug. 26, 2024 " Justice Action Center and Make The Road New York announced a motion to intervene in Texas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
It reiterated that those in political positions had to display greater tolerance, Lopes Gomes Da Silva v Portugal (2002) 34 EHRR 56 and Artun and Güvener v Turkey no. 15510/01 considered. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:58 pm
The defendant argued that the Second Circuit’s decision in Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
The court has now issued a new opinion (Apilado v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
See, Silva v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
Guzman-Silva, Jr., Hector L. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm
The Old Gray Lady and the WaPo in the United States, both of which have covered previous glyphosate cases in the United States, sayeth naught. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:11 am
Pulieri v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
We again decline "to disavow our holding in Walston . . . that imposes an affirmative obligation on a trial court to create a record of compliance under CPL 310.30 and O'Rama" (People v Silva, 24 NY3d 294, 300 [2014], rearg denied 24 N.Y.3d 1216 [2015]; see People v Parker, — NY3d — [decided today]). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:30 pm
Silva v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Craig Silva and Patrick J. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:04 am
Carter, Jr. upheld Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck’s order in Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
