Search for: "State v. Silvas" Results 141 - 160 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm by Hyemin Han
They discussed the leading candidates, Jair Bolsonaro and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the potential crisis that may ensue, and what’s at stake as Brazilians head to the polls on Sunday. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:38 am by HRWatchdog
At the State Capitol rally of independent contractors on August 15 are Christopher Silva (left), Silva Sons Transport Inc., and Connie St. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
It reiterated that those in political positions had to display greater tolerance, Lopes Gomes Da Silva v Portugal (2002) 34 EHRR 56 and Artun and Güvener v Turkey no. 15510/01 considered. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stacey Gray argued that the American Data Privacy and Protection Act would provide protections that are stronger than state protections, establishing a strong national standard for privacy. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:58 pm by John Jascob
The defendant argued that the Second Circuit’s decision in Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm by admin
  The Old Gray Lady and the WaPo in the United States, both of which have covered previous glyphosate cases in the United States, sayeth naught. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We again decline "to disavow our holding in Walston . . . that imposes an affirmative obligation on a trial court to create a record of compliance under CPL 310.30 and O'Rama" (People v Silva, 24 NY3d 294, 300  [2014], rearg denied 24 N.Y.3d 1216 [2015]; see People v Parker, — NY3d — [decided today]). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]