Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 141 - 160
of 619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 12:13 pm
Fredrick v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm
Arguing for Edward Lane, Tejinder Singh suggested a narrow holding that essentially reasserted Garcetti v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:56 am
Satish Chandra ([1954] SCR 1077) and a decision by a majority of four judges in Kharak Singh v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 2:40 pm
The issue of using section 95 to compensate for misconduct was considered in Singh v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB) (see our earlier blog ;here), a claim based on similar facts, the defendant failed to convince the Judge that he believed what he was saying was true. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
The Facts The brief facts of the cases are as follows: Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (‘Paul’) Mr Harminder Singh Paul collapsed and died from a heart attack on 26 January 2014 whilst shopping with his daughters (aged 12 and 9). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Joseph v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02985 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Joseph v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02985 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Kapnick, Gesmer, Singh, JJ. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
Justice DeStefano also rejected Singh’s contention that Radburn no longer was a shareholder of MSN, stating that “at this juncture, [Radburn] is still a 45% shareholder of MSN and the value of [his] shares has not yet been determined notwithstanding [Singh's] 2009 election to purchase,” and that “[i]n the absence of any evidence indicating that [Radburn] sold or… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
; More on this can be found here.Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Benjamin Wittes shared the "Mother May I Launch a Missile" edition of Rational Security: Previewing next week's oral arguments in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:24 pm
The order, authored by Justice M V Muralidharan, directed the inclusion of the Hindu majority Meitei community in the list of Scheduled Tribes, which comes with access to educational, employment and other economic benefits. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am
This news follows a statement earlier last week from Minister of State for External Affairs General Vijay Kumar Singh expressing support for freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
In Balaka Singh v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:12 pm
Sriharan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
That’s Caplinger v. [read post]
