Search for: "State v. Spanks" Results 141 - 160 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
Coming soon… Max Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
" Moreover, [the defendant] stated that there was no intercourse of any kind, but that a client might be spanked or paddled. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
State District Judge Abel Limas issued the ruling after a one-hour hearing involving Los Fresnos families complaining of spankings in Justice of the Peace Gustavo “Gus” Garza’s courtroom. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
Updating this ILB entry from Thursday on the Supreme Court's 4-1 decision Tuesday in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
Law on the Law of Spanking The issue of spanking in schools was raised in the Supreme Court of Canada decision, Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:33 pm
Over the years, when deciding ex post facto cases, the United States Supreme Court has referred repeatedly to its ruling in the Calder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:09 am
More chutzpah on appeal, this time in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
At the Court of Appeals yesterday, while I was waiting for arguments in the Baby case to start, I sat and listened to the arguments in another case, Attorney Grievance Commission v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
Because I am not working for the Chinese government, alleged to be cyber-hacking into Britain's secrets and those of the United States, I have absolutely no idea whether Russia plans to invade or bomb Britain, or do other nefarious activities in our air space, by flying their Tupolev bombers, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, near to European, British and United States airspace. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:28 pm
The Court finds this to be a clear conflict of interest, and Chief Judge Easterbrook's opinion suggests that the attorneys are going to be in for a serious spanking from the Court, and perhaps from the state bar as well.Indeed, Easterbrook's opinion concludes:Arguments designed to protect the attorney at the expense of the client are precisely the sort of acts that invite discipline. [read post]