Search for: "State v. Sullivan & Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
The district court, relying on this Court’s decision in Streets v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 1727-1817 (2010).Smith, Craig. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Read the full decision at: Smith v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Smith. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
Officers Smith and Patrick and Deputy Jones [arrived at his] residence around 9:30 p.m., followed by David Sullivan, an investigator with the district attorney's office . . . who knew Newell. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Sullivan [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
Smith, 494 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, John E. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am
Ann Warren at the Post Chronicle previews Snyder v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Sullivan and John A. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
The decision below is here; the only discussion there is: The petitioner failed to demonstrate “proper cause” for the issuance of a “full carry” permit (Penal Law § 400.00[2][f]; Matter of Hecht v Bivona, 11 AD3d 614; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d 395; Matter of Bando v Sullivan, 290 AD2d 691). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
