Search for: "State v. Sutherland" Results 141 - 160 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
As we stated in part I, the firms that had blogs tended to fall into two camps: Blog-Proud: These firms actually make it very easy to find their attorney's blogs. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:19 am by Rumpole
” ...As Justice George Sutherland aptly stated:[The goal of a prosecutor] in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:12 am by Mandelman
The other, John Noonan, has only worked as a State Bar investigator, and has never before investigated a criminal case. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:30 pm
 68 (S.C.) at para 4; Sutherland Estate v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
 In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:52 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Sawyer, versus the unilateralist vision of the president as “the sole organ of our Nation in foreign affairs” trumpeted by Justice George Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]