Search for: "State v. TM" Results 141 - 160 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
The 2006 amendment preempts state and federal dilution actions against federally registered marks, which also helps big TM owners. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am by Afro Leo
  Alas, it was not to be, but the judgement was interesting for two other reasons.Form of TM applicationlooks clear to me! [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This does push TM law to change too.McKenna: agrees that this was a change in marketing that courts were noticing.Litman: just doesn’t agree with the idea that TM law was “designed” to cut retailers out; maybe a wording issue.McGeveran: consumer v. producer orientation is really important. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:44 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
As predicted, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has now extended its inquiry on the impact of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies to copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property rights. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
New cases have already begun to line-up for consideration next term, starting at the end of September 2021: Standing: Trademark – Standing to Cancel a TM Registration – Naked TM, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
An ACPA claim also survived, as did some state law claims (not state TM claims requiring state registration based on conduct before that registration occurred, which was in 2018). [read post]