Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Earlier this week, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:50 pm
MARSHALL V. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 7:42 am
Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
Mullen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:09 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:16 am
The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format: Taylor Essner, Note, Insider Trading in Flux: Explaining the Second Circuit's Error in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]