Search for: "State v. Taylor E." Results 141 - 160 of 719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
As the man at the center of both  the E. coli E. coli O157H:7  crisis 22 years ago and implementing FSMA since 2010,  Taylor’s departure from government was a major food safety story of 2016. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Prosecution Assistance Program; Joshua Beau Taylor, Student Director; and Richard E. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:30 am by crimdefense@hotmail.com
(v) Other showings that are relevant to the issues identified in paragraphs (i) to (iv) of this subdivision. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Under certain circumstances, a municipality may modify or discontinue providing health insurance benefits to retirees Matter of Kapell v Incorporated Village of Greenport, 2009 NY Slip Op 05134, decided on June 16, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDavid E. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Sherica Celine
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
"As an example, a trustee of the State University pleaded guilty of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
Significantly, Justice Scalia begins by noting that the Court ruled twenty-five years ago in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]