Search for: "State v. Town of Grants"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2022, 3:14 pm
From Anonymous Plaintiff 1 v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
I.V.Ț. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:01 am
From Publicola v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:29 am
Macgowan v Town of Castle Rock, 2022 WL 17176307 (10th Cir. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am
Morse was granted a patent for his telegraph in 1840. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:43 pm
In Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, that court stated “local zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for area variances and the judicial function in reviewing such decisions is a limited one. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
"To establish standing under SEQRA", said the court, "a petitioner must show (1) an environmental injury that is in some way different from that of the public at large, and (2) that the alleged injury falls within the zone of interests sought to be protected or promoted by SEQRA," citing Matter of Tuxedo Land Trust, Inc. v Town Bd. of Town of Tuxedo, 112 AD3d 726 and other decisions. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
"To establish standing under SEQRA", said the court, "a petitioner must show (1) an environmental injury that is in some way different from that of the public at large, and (2) that the alleged injury falls within the zone of interests sought to be protected or promoted by SEQRA," citing Matter of Tuxedo Land Trust, Inc. v Town Bd. of Town of Tuxedo, 112 AD3d 726 and other decisions. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
In the 2015 case of Reed v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
Most recently, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 12:37 pm
In NAACP v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
Granting amendment to name these necessary parties would be improper, as the statute of limitations to bring claims against these parties has passed (Watkins v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
Granting amendment to name these necessary parties would be improper, as the statute of limitations to bring claims against these parties has passed (Watkins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:06 am
Naegele v Fox, 206 A.D. 3d 1558 (4 Dept. 6/3/2022) [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) Kialegee Tribal Town v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Once viewed as an exception to the liberal jurisprudence that dominated the Supreme Court's journey through the Religion Clauses between 1947 and about 2010 (Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit (en banc): Have you read McCulloch v. [read post]
