Search for: "State v. Underwriters at Lloyds London" Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Docket: 09-945 Issue: Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
This is reflected in microcosm by the spike in claims in the London Commercial Court in the late 1990s. 1,808 claims were initiated in 1999, explained in large part by the implosion of the Lloyd’s insurance market.8 Creditors become impatient in times of diminished liquidity. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:06 am by Erin Miller
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (09-945), and Jaskolski v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Insurance Alliance provided Highport with a property insurance agreement from defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London ("Lloyd's"). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:08 am by Michael Thomas
The Court noted that AXA would only have the duty to defend the City if the Statements of Claim in the underlying actions alleged a state of facts that, properly construed, would support an action that could potentially fall within coverage: Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyds of London v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:20 pm by Mike Aylward
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 468 F.3d 120 (2nd Cir. 2006). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, the Fifth Circuit concluded that a non-self-executing treaty, as implemented by federal statute, was not reverse preempted by state law. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:19 am
Where the covered risks are spread over multiple states, courts will generally locate the risk in one state, namely, "the state of the insured's domicile at the time the policy was issued," and a "corporate insured's domicile is the state of its principal place of business" (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v Foster Wheeler Corp., 36 AD3d 17, 24-25 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 928 [2007]). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Steven V. Buckman
  Willbros purchased a $25 Million excess liability policy through certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. [read post]