Search for: "State v. Via"
Results 141 - 160
of 15,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
Knick v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
In Geiling v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:19 am
Today the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its opinion in Wilcox v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
DHS and United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm
This is a necessary step to preserve the issue of denied witnesses at the Article 32, UCMJ, hearing Here is a link to the Army news release, via Miami Herald. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
In Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 135 F. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 11:20 am
And you can access the audio of today's reargument en banc in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
United States, No. 13-9026. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:18 pm
Via Sergio Muñoz-Sarmiento, I see that the New York State Court of Appeals has affirmed the dismissal of Erno Nussenzweig's privacy suit against Philip-Lorca diCorcia, discussed earlier here. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:50 am
Mohamed v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:50 pm
Stay tuned for V-Prize updates and other developments via Virginia space lawyer Jack Kennedy's Spaceports blog; and for a bit more background, see The V-Prize: one hour to Europe The Space Review, Aug. 27, 2007. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:08 am
Jun 28, 2010 Bilski v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:18 am
“Truth, Reconciliation, and Korematsu v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
