Search for: "State v. Wal" Results 141 - 160 of 1,853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 3:55 am by Chris Seaton
Now an algorithm had the discretion thanks to a state mandate, and that algorithm assigned Judge Waters the case of Bishop v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Filings of “smaller” employment discrimination class actions have increased due to a strategy whereby state or regional-type classes are asserted more often than the type of nationwide mega-cases that Wal-Mart discouraged. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Filings of “smaller” employment discrimination class actions have increased due to a strategy whereby state or regional-type classes are asserted more often than the type of nationwide mega-cases that Wal-Mart discouraged. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:29 am by Nassiri Law
Wal-Mart, Inc., in effect reaffirming the state’s definition of what qualifies as compensable work. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 11:13 am by Steven Cohen
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi – June 5th) involves a slip and fall. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
First, because the Ninth Circuit already recognized that some class members in this case may not have a constitutional right to bond hearings, the class may no longer satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]