Search for: "State v. Wooden" Results 141 - 160 of 434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 10:58 pm by Patricia Salkin
” East End Eruv Association v Town of Southampton, (Suffolk Co. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Though often hailed as an originalist triumph, Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
The demarcation of the eruv may be created by using telephone poles, utility poles, wires, and existing boundaries, and by attaching wooden or plastic strips known as “lechis” to the sides of the poles. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
The demarcation of the eruv may be created by using telephone poles, utility poles, wires, and existing boundaries, and by attaching wooden or plastic strips known as “lechis” to the sides of the poles. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 5:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff also sues under the state law prohibiting discrimination, though it does not distinguish between the state and city laws in its analysis.The case is Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Josh Blackman
Five of the Kavanaugh concurrences were solo (Wooden, Ramirez, Shurtleff, Dobbs, and Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:28 am by Larry
E&S Express Inc. and Simon Ying v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:35 am by David DePaolo
Good enough to support whatever proposition the evidence is being used for.The standard is whether someone can reasonably rely upon the evidence to support whatever the conclusion is that is being proffered.In Missouri, an appellate court upheld an award of permanent total disability benefits to a factory worker based on substantial evidence that her work-related back injury, combined with her preexisting physical and psychological issues, left her unemployable, thus qualifying her for the… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Larry
The resulting case is Andritz Sundwig GmbH v. [read post]