Search for: "State v. Yates" Results 141 - 160 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45)  he should have omitted the word… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:44 am by Jeffrey Green and Ivan Dominguez
” The Supreme Court once again took federal prosecutors to task in its February 25, 2015 opinion in Yates v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 121 (15 September 2011) Appeal from: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1169 See also: Innovation Patent Claims Once Again Construed Narrowly Claim construction –  whether ‘device’ encompasses apparatus in two parts In an appeal from a decision of Justice Barker in the Federal Court of Australia, a full bench of the court comprising Justices Bennett, Gilmour and… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of Wednesday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: MICHAEL ANTONIO PATTERSON v. [read post]