Search for: "Steve Flynn" Results 141 - 160 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
On the National Security Law Podcast, Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck discussed just what’s so important about Carpenter. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:29 am by Timothy Edgar, Susan Hennessey
As Steve Vladeck notes, the only even remotely plausible statute under which Comey’s conduct might be criminal is 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 10:17 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 Finally, Steve and Bobby wrap the show by talking about some of their favorite foreign cities. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:13 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It makes him look almost a foolish as Steve Martin. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:25 am by Jim Sedor
” By Peter Baker and Glenn Thrush for New York Times “Explanations for Kushner’s Meeting with Head of Kremlin-Linked Bank Don’t Match Up” by David Filipov, Amy Brittain, Rosalind Helderman, and Tom Hamburger for Washington Post “White House Waivers May Have Violated Ethics Rules” by Steve Eder and Eric Lipton for New York Times Michigan: “Rizzo Star Witness Sours on Feds, Gets Indicted” by Robert Snell for Detroit News North Carolina:… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Matthew Kahn
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck posted the latest edition of the National Security Law Podcast. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm by Sandy Levinson
  The first involves his use of the Pardon Power, though it is altogether likely that our sociopathic president will be more than happy, just before he exits, to issue a general pardon beginning with Michael Flynn, and ending, perhaps, with Trump himself. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Don’t Be So Quick to Call Those Disclosures ‘Legal‘ by Elizabeth Goitein, Just Security, May 17, 2017 “Why Trump’s Disclosure to Russia (and Urging Comey to Drop the Flynn Investigation, and Various Other Actions) Could Be Unlawful” by Marty Lederman and David Pozen, Just Security, May 17, 2017 “Trump’s disclosures to the Russians might actually have been illegal” by Steve Vladeck, Washington Post, May 16, 2017 [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck published Episode 18 of the National Security Law Podcast: Disclosing Secrets to the Russians Makes Me WannaCry. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
  What about Flynn’s successor, former Gen. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Michael Flynn’s contacts with Russian officials. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:21 am by Jim Sedor
” by Alexei Koseff for Sacramento Bee Florida: “When That Feisty Neighbor Becomes the President” by Michael LaForgia and Steve Eder for New York Times Illinois: “Ex-Top Aide to Dorothy Brown Indicted on Charges She Lied to Grand Jury” by Jason Meisner for Chicago Tribune New York: “Murky Definitions for Government Entities Undermines Transparency” by Rachel Silberstein for Gotham Gazette [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:19 am by Helen Klein Murillo
The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked Trump associates including Roger Stone, Carter Page, Paul Manafort, and Michael Flynn to provide emails and other records of their communications with Russian officials. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 8:53 am by Quinta Jurecic
Cummings indicating that Flynn may not have disclosed his payments from foreign governments on his application to renew his security clearance. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:36 am by Helen Klein Murillo
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck posted a new episode of the National Security Law Podcast, in which they discuss possible charges against Julian Assange, the latest on Mike Flynn, the annual FOIA report, and more. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:15 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
This leads into a discussion of the charges that Mike Flynn one day might face, and that in turn prompts a disagreement about what to make of the White House letter rebuffing requests for information submitted by the House Government Oversight Committee. [read post]