Search for: "Strickland v. Washington"
Results 141 - 160
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Cronic prejudice standard applies, or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
In his footnote 4, Simpson compared Sypher's motion with the Wikipedia entry for Strickland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Kelly dissented, concluding Cronic does not apply to the facts of this case, and that the motion for new trial should have been analyzed under Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668; 104 S Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm
Daire v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:57 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, applied the two prong test developed in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:47 am
VI; Strickland v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).See United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2004, 9:12 am
Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:57 pm
Washington. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
Washington. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:56 am
The standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a court-martial is the two-part test established in Strickland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
Washington. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court's decision in the landmark ineffective assistance case, Strickland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
Washington. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm
Dyk explained that a 1984 decision, Strickland v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
The court explained thatUnder the performance prong of the Strickland v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The undeniable fact is that Padilla was decided squarely on the basis of Strickland v. [read post]
