Search for: "Sullivan v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 2,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 1:43 pm
Sullivan, and an essay comparing originalism and common good constitutionalism under a transparency rubric.Criminal LawAn article on criminal laws that appear to remain on the books despite strong indications that they are contrary to the will of a majority of those subject to the laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
 Sullivan and from the Seventh Circuit's precedent in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963), and the Seventh Circuit's decision in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court dismissed the case under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, but the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Chin and Bianco) reinstates the claim.How does this case fare under Littlejohn and Vega? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” Now the Delaware state court has decisively ruled that the statements at issue in the case are false. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge:  Wood v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 4:18 am by John R. Byrne
Sullivan:“In Sullivan, an advertisement containing false information was published in theNew York Times. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]