Search for: "Supreme Van Lines"
Results 141 - 160
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
Bravin also discussed two Supreme Court cases with Professor George —Van Orden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 2:44 am
Again, McConnell voted to table the motion, and that tabling motion passed on a 53-47 party-line vote.Given Roberts' decision not to vote on any ties, if the votes on McConnell's motions to table would've been 50-50, those motions would have failed, leading to debate . . . but then, after debate, if Schumer's motions to subpoena, and Van Hollen's motion to instruct the Chief Justice to decide subpoena motions, likewise would have resulted in 50-50… [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Chris Van Hollen argued in a November 2019 Senate Budget Committee hearing, “no president, Democrat or Republican, should be able to play that kind of game and run out the clock. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:38 pm
Related Cases: Van Buren v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:30 am
Bernheim Fine Lines and Dr. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:02 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Aug. 1, 2019, U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
To support his conclusion, AG followed the line of reasoning developed by the Court in the context of the instruments preceding the Brussels I bis Regulation. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
The speakers -- apart from Margot Fröhlinger -- include Benoît Battistelli (EPO President), former Court of Justice of the European Union and Irish Supreme Court judge Fidelma Macken, Alain Girardet (Cour de Cassation, France), Cornelis Schüller (Nestec SA), Ulrike Voß (Oberlandesgericht, Düsseldorf), Robert van Peursem (Advocate-General, Hoge Raad, The Netherlands), Lord Justice Kitchin (Court of Appeal, England and Wales) and Catriona Hammer… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:48 pm
Van Patten, 128 S. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:06 am
Focusing on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Miller, it argues that Brexit may have paradoxical effects within the case law. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
”That's the question that Van Chester Thompkins was asked after 3 hours of questioning in which he remained silent. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause ruling in June in Bullcoming v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court than I have make of the chapter. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
The law is clearly unconstitutional under current Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am
Van Valkerburg. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:30 am
According to the facts revealed at trial, as the plaintiff approached an intersection and attempted to brake, the brake line failed. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:00 am
The court’s civil unanimity rate returned to something much closer to its recent trend line this past year, up from 58.8 percent in 2013 to 77.8 percent in 2014. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:49 am
Walker v Innospec Ltd – The UK Supreme Court Disapplies a Statutory Provision on the Grounds of Incompatibility with EU Equality Law Last week’s decision of the UK Supreme Court in the same-sex pension rights case of Walker v Innospec Ltd [2017] UKSC 47 generated plenty of excited commentary in the UK media. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
Supreme Court in Brendlin v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
So far, the court has been unable to coalesce on a doctrinal through-line for First Amendment challenges like these. [read post]
