Search for: "Sweat v. Does" Results 141 - 160 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
 Under copyright law, "originality" does not have to be creative though, as the courts have affirmed -- though they sometimes get it wrong, as in Hadley v Kemp in 1999 (the 'Spandau Ballet' case). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:16 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 When this does happen, the insurance company (in my experience) will naturally “latch on” to the second accident as the “sole” cause of injury. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:59 pm
After all, traditional appraisers put in their sweat of the brow, so shouldn't they be rewarded? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
does trading on goodwill mean materiality? [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am by Barry Eagar
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]