Search for: "T Hurst" Results 141 - 160 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 1:43 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  It's pure socio-legal history, in the tradition of Willard Hurst, who indeed may have been the one who suggested the topic (I honestly don't remember). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
 He also agrees with Hurst that growers who aren't up to speed on the added scrutiny on irrigation water need to get their heads out of the sand. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:33 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Even in Grand Prairie, Arlington, Fort Worth, Dallas, Euless, Bedford, Hurst, Saginaw, Roanoke, Keller, Grapevine, and other locations in the Metroplex area, arson fires occur. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:07 pm
I'm curious if any of these Alabama proposals willl actually become law.H/T: Sentecing Law & Policy. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:50 am by Steve Hall
Hurst affirmed that there was no evidence proving arson. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:45 am by Joe Mullin
" The statements didn't violate the protective order, Oracle argues, and they fall short of the legal requirements for contempt. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:21 am by William K. Berenson
The Hurst police chief was the chief advocate for the new rules: “Since the state isn’t doing anything on this, we wanted to follow what other cities have done. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
  If you don't support marriage for same-sex couples, then don't vote for it. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
ICYMI: "Royal archives that we pay for but aren’t allowed to read: a brief history" (LSE British Politics and Policy).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:30 am by Dan Ernst
He was a William Nelson Cromwell Fellow in American Legal History in 2010-11 and a fellow at the Hurst Summer Institute in Legal History in 2011. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Placing judicial originalism into the foreground of our discussion of Section 5 jurisprudence thus offers additional support for a broader reading of the congressional enforcement power than exists today under Boerne.H/t: Legal Theory Blog, where my colleague Lawrence Solum writes that the paper includes “no discussion of the original public meaning of the text of Section 5. [read post]