Search for: "T T
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
States can’t protect children by overly burdening adult speech, which is what a categorical ban does. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:49 am
Credit Union v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:15 am
-EV] The States don't have arbitrary power, but they have discretion to act reasonably in protecting the public's health. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:36 am
Like its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 801(c) defines hearsay as a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
As such, the Court stated “[t]he Commission maintains the authority and statutory responsibility to supervise and regulate the Contract. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
It so happens that Indiana was on that list:Indiana: Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 1:07 pm
Further, the court stated “[t]here are only so many ways to arrange a few bedrooms, a kitchen, some common areas, and an attached garage, so not every nook and cranny of an architectural floor plan enjoys copyright protection. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 7:35 pm
The case, Dalzell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
See Indiana Heart Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:02 am
See MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
Meanwhile, those who choose to live apart for other reasons temporarily don’t fare quite as bad, mostly because they aren’t facing all the same kinds of problems. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am
In this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that opined the discretionary planning function immunity applied, which as noted in the 1988 Indiana Supreme Court case of Peavler v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
State of Indiana, a 5-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Dickson writes:The defendant, William T. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:08 pm
A release posted today by the Clerk of the USDC in Indianapolis announces:The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana announced today the selection of Debra McVicker Lynch for the position of United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:31 am
In Clark and Biddle v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
Additional Resources:Stacy M. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
County must pay for parent s appointed attorneyNoting a paradigm shift in parental rights termination cases due to House Enrolled Act 1001, one Indiana Court of Appeals judge believed the Department of Child Services instead of the counties should be responsible for the costs of appointed counsel in these types of proceedings.But the majority in In Re The Termination of the Parental Relationship of J.G., a minor child; S.G., mother, and J.G., father, and Indiana Department of Child… [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 am
So the Indiana Supreme Court held this morning in State v. [read post]
