Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor"
Results 141 - 160
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
After a known exposure to hepatitis A, administration of a shot of immune globulin should be considered. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:59 am
Dawn Zoldi wrote about the case RaceDayQuads v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am
It was, as per Taylor v Slough BC (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch), possible to ‘remedy’ a breach. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 12:45 pm
The Fashion Law tells the rest of the story.Agnieszka Sztoldman (Taylor Wessing, University of Wroclaw) discusses about genuine use in the EU, commenting on the Monster Energy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:59 am
This remained the position of the USDA and the meat industry until 1994 when, in an act of both common-sense and bravado, Michael Taylor, then FSIS Administrator, announced that E. coli O157:H7 would be deemed an adulterant in raw ground beef. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:52 am
This remained the position of the USDA and the meat industry until 1994 when, in an act of both commonsense and bravado, Michael Taylor, then FSIS Administrator, announced that E. coli O157:H7 would be deemed an adulterant in raw ground beef. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
This remained the position of the USDA and the meat industry until 1994 when, in an act of both commonsense and bravado, Michael Taylor, then FSIS Administrator, announced that E. coli O157:H7 would be deemed an adulterant in raw ground beef. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Currently pending before the en banc Federal Circuit is Taylor v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. [read post]
