Search for: "Teague v. Lane"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Lane or a replacement for it. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
He explained that under Teague v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
This book examines: -An Overview of Section 2255 Proceedings, including the relationship of Section 2255 to other federal postconviction remedies -Timing Considerations, including the statute of limitations -Section 2255 Jurisdiction, including custody and mootness, and cognizable claims -Obstacles to Relief, including retroactive application of Teague v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:15 am
After Teague v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm
In practice, that part of the rule generally gets to the same result as the 1989 rule of Teague v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
Ct. 718 (2016), the Court held that “Miller announced a substantive rule of constitutional law” that, under Teague v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Kentucky and Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
The process that the Court uses to decide whether to make one of its criminal law rulings retroactive, to closed cases, dates from its 1989 ruling in Teague v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm
" This is consistent with the Court's treatment of the questions of what is a "new rule" for the purpose of retroactivity under Teague v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Jeanette Turner v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am
Harris12-885Issue: (1) Whether the Seventh Circuit contravened either the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) or Teague v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Street, and violated Teague v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Lane. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Lane is categorical, such that when the Supreme Court held that Johnson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Lane (1989) and Coleman v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
