Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Core"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
It is rotten to its core. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:42 am
People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
It is that core that Nathan Collier is challenging, citing Obergefell in support. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm
In Estelle v. [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
” In 2007, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
While King v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
In Benecard Servs. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 10:25 am
Case citation: Knapke v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
Suarez and People v. [read post]
A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA's Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
Today, in our landmark case Jewel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
In MH v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm
Sanford, which held that Black people had no rights white men were bound to respect, or Plessy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:11 am
Today's blog of the Hawaii Supreme Court oral arguments in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
