Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hawkins" Results 141 - 160 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 12:00 pm
The first is authored by cross-town friend and UH law prof Jim Hawkins (pictured) and is titled   "Doctors as Bankers: Evidence from Fertility Markets. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
First, on June 5, 2009 in People v Joseph (63 AD3d 1658 [June 5, 2009]), then on June 12, 2009, in People v Mills (63 AD3d 1717 [June 12, 2009]) and, again on July 10, 2009 in People v Reome (2009 NY Slip Op 05804 [July 10, 2009]).Since 1995 there have been more than 1500 such decisions statewide. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Hawkins, 686 A.2d 567, 583-84 (D.C. 1996) ("persuaded by" Northern Trust v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Okay, so I'll take that last comment -- intended or not -- as a (perhaps entirely deserved) slam on people who include myself. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:53 am
Both Jeralyn and I wrote about the Ninth Circuit decision (PDF) in Mohamed v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
So good job to both Judge Hawkins (who gave the kudos) and Steve and Kelly (who earned them). [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 1:46 pm
Learned put us in touch with his father, Fred Foote, who recalls: “I was sitting in Torts and I believe the case was Hawkins v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
" The dissenter, Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale, argues that the 11th Circuit is correct, but does not expend very much time on the matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on First Amendment… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]