Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sears"
Results 141 - 160
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
According to the AP story, “Sears is one of the companies using apps. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 11:25 am
The style of the case is, Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
It sounds harsh, but maybe people in the middle class need to decide to take a pay cut. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
It sounds harsh, but maybe people in the middle class need to decide to take a pay cut. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 504 F. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
See, People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Patchak (11-246) and Salazar v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Very difficult claim to make because the information is public, or shared with a large number of people. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Justices Cavanagh and Marilyn Kelly would grant the application in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
This is not good news for people hoping that the Mississippi Supreme Court will strike Mississippi's caps in the Sears case. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
Sears Roebuck and Company. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:54 am
Most reasonable people would agree that it should not. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 10:41 am
Sears Roebuck Co. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:53 am
I attended the oral argument in Sears v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
The oral argument in Sears v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
Sears/Compco is (1), Bonito Boats is (2)—recharacterizes Sears/Compco to say that as long as there’s a functionality defense and a secondary meaning requirement, preventing access to the feature is fine. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:24 am
" * What are people bringing trademark lawsuits over? [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:05 am
., Verizon Communications, even Sears). [read post]