Search for: "The United States Court of Federal Claims" Results 141 - 160 of 37,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 7:42 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Bruno, Jonathan, The Weakness of the Case for Cameras in the United States Supreme Court (January 5, 2015). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that "[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that "[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 3:11 pm by getnickadmin
Under the United States False Claims Act, a whistleblower can sue a corporation for defrauding the federal government and she or he can continue the lawsuit on behalf of the federal government even after the government chooses not to intervene in the litigation. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:36 am by Jordan M. Asch
The court explains that its decision encourages Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) to “settle with both the relevant State and Federal Governments,” and avoids a “perverse incentive[ ] for a PRP to resolve [State] claims only in the hope of barring other PRPs from seeking contribution on federal claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:47 am by Jordan M. Asch
The court explains that its decision encourages Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) to “settle with both the relevant State and Federal Governments,” and avoids a “perverse incentive[ ] for a PRP to resolve [State] claims only in the hope of barring other PRPs from seeking contribution on federal claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:47 am by Jordan M. Asch
The court explains that its decision encourages Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) to “settle with both the relevant State and Federal Governments,” and avoids a “perverse incentive[ ] for a PRP to resolve [State] claims only in the hope of barring other PRPs from seeking contribution on federal claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:47 am by Jordan M. Asch
The court explains that its decision encourages Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) to “settle with both the relevant State and Federal Governments,” and avoids a “perverse incentive[ ] for a PRP to resolve [State] claims only in the hope of barring other PRPs from seeking contribution on federal claims. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:05 am by Gene Quinn
To date the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has not explicitly required district courts to conduct a formal claim construction prior to determining whether a patent claim is directed to patent eligible subject matter. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:35 pm by Unknown
The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is working with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to essentially determine if the benefits of small claims patent courts outweigh the costs. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:36 am by Arfaa Law Group
Medical Malpractice Claims Pursued in Federal Court After reviewing the evidence presented, the court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 7:22 am by The Law Office of James K. Meehan
Allegedly, the United States was then substituted as the defendant, due to the fact that the defendant hospital was federally funded. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The United States' amicus brief may carry significant weight with the Federal Circuit. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
The United States Supreme Court has reversed a California appellate court’s refusal to enforce an arbitration provision in a contract, concluding that the court’s decision is incompatible with the Federal Arbitration Act and prior Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
The United States Supreme Court has reversed a California appellate court’s refusal to enforce an arbitration provision in a contract, concluding that the court’s decision is incompatible with the Federal Arbitration Act and prior Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mitchell of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kapton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm by fraudfighters
  They are currently awaiting trial in the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. [read post]