Search for: "Thomas v. Facebook, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
CNN reports on claims that Facebook lacks transparency and ethics in its attempt to identify posts which appear pose suicide risks. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
If you get a job as a felon, share it with us on Facebook. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The application to dismiss a defamation claim as a Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPP) under s.4 of the Protection of Public Participation Act 2019 was dismissed in Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. v Bockhold, 2022 BCSC 499 (CanLII). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
. * Katz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The standing issue is an important one for businesses such as Facebook Inc., Google Inc. and Yahoo Inc., which filed an amicus brief with the high court in June 2014 arguing that allowing the Ninth Circuit’s ruling to stand would open the floodgates to a barrage of “no injury” class actions. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Trump for President, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 1560462 (Colo. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 9:56 am
" Likewise, in Gilbert v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
But no such determination was made about Pamela Stark's Facebook post. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The case, Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
Likewise for Twitter letting people go to individual pages such as http://twitter.com/RealDonaldTrump, Facebook letting people to go to individual Facebook pages, YouTube letting people view individual videos, and the like. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post on the decision in Molinaro v Molinaro – in which the California Court of Appeal reversed an order prohibiting a party from posting anything about the case on Facebook. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Sexton and Landstar Ranger, Inc. , in which U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William… [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:37 am
” FEC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
A recent trademark dispute between fitness-tech company iFIT inc. and lingerie retailer Victoria Secret shows that any everyday word (here, “SWEAT”) can qualify for trademark protection. [read post]
