Search for: "Thomas v. Given"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Recall that in 2018, in Pereira v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
” Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or comfort” to foreign… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
As Thomas Merrill has noted, “[a]dministrative rulemaking, at least in its modern guise, is subject to a much more unyielding set of procedural requirements” than legislative statute-making. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
”). [3] Beth Israel Hosp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Thomas McCarthy Trustee Chair in Law and Political Science at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
Like any newspaper in a given market, X (f.k.a. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am
The claimant obtained reports from a gastroenterologist, Dr Thomas, and a microbiologist, Professor Pennington. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
” In July 2023, the High Court ruled part of the article carried defamatory meaning, in part because it could have been read as alleging Harry “was responsible for trying to mislead and confuse the public as to the true position, which was ironic given that he now held a public role in tackling ‘misinformation,’” The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2022] EWHC 1755 (QB). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
The author of a critical edition is required to ‘reconstruct’ the meaning of the text and convey the original message, given that such text is likely to be missing ‘pieces’.Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work.Despite (or rather because of?) [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:08 am
Circuit case, Chambers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Thomas. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Thomas Ludden. [read post]