Search for: "Thomas v. Given" Results 141 - 160 of 5,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or comfort” to foreign… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
 As Thomas Merrill has noted, “[a]dministrative rulemaking, at least in its modern guise, is subject to a much more unyielding set of procedural requirements” than legislative statute-making. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Thomas McCarthy Trustee Chair in Law and Political Science at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
The claimant obtained reports from a gastroenterologist, Dr Thomas, and a microbiologist, Professor Pennington. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
” In July 2023, the High Court ruled part of the article carried defamatory meaning, in part because it could have been read as alleging Harry “was responsible for trying to mislead and confuse the public as to the true position, which was ironic given that he now held a public role in tackling ‘misinformation,’” The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2022] EWHC 1755 (QB). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
The author of a critical edition is required to ‘reconstruct’ the meaning of the text and convey the original message, given that such text is likely to be missing ‘pieces’.Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work.Despite (or rather because of?) [read post]