Search for: "Thomas v. Rogers" Results 141 - 160 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Thomas Seamands, the army's deputy chief of staff; Vice Adm. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Michele Goodwin weighs in on June Medical Services v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:11 am by Ben Allen
  Writing for the majority, Judge Rogers noted that the question of whether the affidavit demonstrated probable cause to support the warrant was "not even close. [read post]