Search for: "Tommie v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court with District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:00 am
For example, even if TOMMY HILFIGER is a famous mark, this does not mean that the TH logo is a famous mark (H/T TTAB). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Rather, the quoted language came from an SDNY decision (Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
TOMMY CONSTANTINE RACING, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, and TOMMY CONSTANTINE, a/k/a THOMAS CONSTANTINE, individually, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
Nicklin J ruled that the meaning of Murray’s tweet was that Riley “had publicly stated in a tweet that he [Mr Corbyn] deserved to be violently attacked”. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Tommy D. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Jasmine Carter v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:51 am
The style of the case is, Tommy Hamilton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am
If you haven’t already seen it, be sure to check out Tommy Eden’s guest blog post from earlier this week about Jarvela v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
” Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
We tend to forget this, not least because Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice is taken to be the last word, but then we forget that when Sir Thomas Erskine May published his treatise in 1844, MPs could be relied upon to have a sense of propriety and would not, say, invite a hate-mongering convicted felon like Tommy Robinson to come have dinner. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:58 am
She has said that she remembers when she was eight years old, her father came home from his job as a schoolteacher and told her about the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court addressed the issue in 1986, in the case of Ford v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:48 am
If it really comes down to Nixon v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
