Search for: "Train v. City of New York"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 10:15 am
City of New York, the Second Circuit upheld a large jury verdict in favor of a collective of workers regarding off-the-clock work. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:33 am
New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Term, 2nd Department 2015), the award has been affirmed. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
Yau Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYTorts City's Failure to Provide Discovery Precludes Plaintiff From Showing City Caused, Created Defect Claimed Bailey v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
In People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:53 am
Vegas New, York City is not. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:35 am
New York City Transit Authority, decided on September 16. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:36 am
City of New York, issued on May 21. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 2:28 am
A New York criminal defense law firm located in lower Manhattan, the New York criminal lawyers and former Manhattan prosecutors at Crotty Saland PC represent clients throughout the New York City, Hudson Valley region and many other municipalities. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
A number of emails arrived yesterday asking what I thought the McDonald decision meant for New York City. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 11:57 am
Warley v Grampp, 2013 NY Slip Op 04080 [107 AD3d 1111] [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
Established by two former Manhattan prosecutors, Crotty Saland PC is a New York criminal defense firm representing clients accused of crimes throughout New York City and the surrounding region. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:22 am
City Of New York , et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – November 12th, 2019) involves a claim of injuries sustained by the plaintiff after an altercation with the New York City Police Department (NYPD). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:28 pm
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training… [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:27 pm
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training… [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training… [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:32 pm
New York City Board of Education, No. 09-CV-1167 (S.D.N.Y.), that no rule promulgated by the Board of Education had any clear application to the incident in question, that the rule initially cited against the teacher was clearly inapplicable on the facts, and that the rule subsequently cited in a letter to her by her principal also did not apply to the situation. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:35 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run April 12, 2009. [read post]