Search for: "Turk v. Turk"
Results 141 - 160
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
Used Mechanical Turk, group broadly representative of US population. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Defamation * Lokhova v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Participants were English speakers using Mechanical Turk. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The Independent newspaper is currently defending a libel case against Lord Ashcroft over articles published in November 2009 about business in the Turks and Caicos Islands. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Libertines do show a big difference; Mechanical Turk has very few puritans. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:16 pm
See Ebenhoe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
., oDesk/TaskRabbit/Mechanical Turk; Lyft/Uber; open source/wiki contributions; and UGC moderators. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am
This allegation comes as the Turkish government plays defensive in the face of another New York Times report that claimed the Turks may be increasing ISIS’s coffers by buying oil from areas occupied by the militant group. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Amanda Hollis-BruskyTaking Back the Constitution is an ambitious book that covers a wide swath of territory in its attempt to explain, critique and offer alternatives to the contemporary Supreme Court and its constitutional agenda. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
Michael J. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
