Search for: "Turner v. Turner" Results 141 - 160 of 1,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Because review of NAC’s liability insurance policies to determine their potential applicability to the judgment in the underlying action fell outside the scope of HSE’s engagement, the court properly granted HSE’s motion with respect to the professional negligence/legal malpractice cause of action against HSE insofar as asserted by NAC (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:09 am by Bonnie Shucha
On the latest episode of the WI Law in Action podcast from the UW Law Library, host Kris Turner interviews UW Law School’s William Voss-Bascom Professor Anuj Desai. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds these guidelines do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Reynolds v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the retainer agreement utterly refutes the plaintiffs’ contention with respect to the scope of the CMM defendants’ representation in that regard (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850), and the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the fourth and fifth causes of action. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:30 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This Essay argues that current definitions and applications of “legal advice” are overly and unnecessarily broad, confusing those bound by them, severely disadvantaging pro se litigants, undermining the purpose of such limitations, and, in more extreme cases, implicating due-process concerns expressed by the Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:43 am by Rachel Casper
” Find more here, including an invitation to participate from ABA President Reginald Turner. [read post]