Search for: "U. S. v. Field"
Results 141 - 160
of 825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm
At the Supreme Court, the NCAA cited the Court’s previous decision in the 1984 case NCAA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
So that’s a bit of a pickle.] [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Improvements to the IRS’s technological infrastructure could reduce the tax gap while not creating new burdens for taxpayers. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
That was just returned today by the jury in Cardin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
V.) [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:05 am
Conversant is commended as the very first action preservation ruling having the “anti-suit injunction” nature in the field of intellectual property rights litigation in China, which has prematurely established the Chinese approach to anti-suit injunction in judicial practice. [24 [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:03 am
Philadelphia, 593 U. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
Today they account for over a fifth of the world's largest enterprises as opposed to ten years ago where only one or two SOEs could be found at the top of the league table. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
In today's Supreme Court decision in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., 468 U. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Black v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:21 am
FTF Lending, LLC v Mavirides Moyal Packman & Sadkin, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 31502(U) May 4, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153620/2020 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:00 am
Woodson v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
