Search for: "U. S. v. Sport" Results 141 - 160 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
  The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
In response to an email inquiry from a non-sponsor seeking clarification of the rules regarding whether it would be permissible for her to “discuss the Olympics…on social media,” the USOC informed her: [U]nless a company or organization’s primary business is disseminating news and information, the company’s social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, Instagram, etc.) are commercial in nature, serving to promote the company or… [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
As many anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision in Blackhorse v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by David Post
 [There’s another case squarely on point that discredits this idea, too — NBA v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
  "Sports Agent Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Dispute Heats Up in California," notes Seyfarth Shaw's Robert Milligan in an update on a high profile case, Mintz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
 “[U]nless the manufacturer’s breach of its duty to test leads the manufacturer t [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:23 am
The closest the lecture got to addressing IP was a brief mention of the company's interest in reaching agreement to obtain more non-U.S. sports contents, e.g., the Indian cricket league. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has published its support of the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports revised measures to protect people from anonymous trolls with the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am by Justin P. Webb
We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]