Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor" Results 141 - 160 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The district argued that PERB had exclusive jurisdiction over such issues.The Commissioner ruled that his disposition of the appeal considered matters unrelated to the Taylor Law and thus his dismissal of Fusco’s appeal and deferral to PERB was not required.In addition, the district asked the Commissioner for permission to submit two additional documents it claimed addressed substantive issues related to Fusco’s conduct after it had filed its answer to… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Prohibited subjects of arbitrationMatter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm by David Kopel
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
Judge Wood addressed the “sophisticated intermediary” doctrine in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
Union can require non-members to contribute to union’s legal feesLocke et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]