Search for: "U.S. v. Felix"
Results 141 - 160
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 am
U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
I know of only one appellate case that authorized a similar order, People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:37 am
A former U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
[Dixon], [Felix] Marrero, and several others entered the lobby seconds later. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:48 am
Officer, Two Centuries of Compensation for U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:37 am
However, in 1978, the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:33 pm
Thus, neither the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:17 am
" *** V. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
For example, at oral argument earlier this week, former U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am
And a preliminary ruling of the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Case of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Critical Analysis for Lawyers and Laymen 1 v. (1927) Frankfurter, Felix. [read post]
Business and criminal law, health care reform, and chicken mole poblano and rosemary mashed potatoes
22 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
YOLANDA MARTES, MARIA RAMIREZ, PAULA NEHER, FELIX RAPALO, SHAWNEEQUA ELLIOTT, as Guardian for J.A., a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
A U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
Schmidt on Brown and Constitutional History of Reconstruction (and a Postscript on Hurst and Gutman)
23 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
Coleman, the first Black American to clerk for a U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
