Search for: "U.S. v. Floyd"
Results 141 - 160
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm
District Judge Shira Scheindlin required the NYPD to make public all raw stop-and-frisk data from 1998 through the present in relation to the case, Floyd v. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
Floyd Law Firm. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
And at the Wall Street Journal, James Taranto interviews Floyd Abrams, who in 2003 argued for the losing side in McConnell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:47 pm
Floyd, — Fed.Appx. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:36 am
Allen 22-490Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
It came as no surprise when, in June, Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and 41 other U.S. senators, Democrats all, proposed a campaign finance amendment to the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
Judge Lock referred the motion to another judge, James Floyd Ammons, Jr., who denied it. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court announced Friday that the audiotape of next Wednesday’s oral argument in a major campaign finance case, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Referring to the 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
Judge Floyd dissented. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:41 am
Last week, EFF urged the full U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
This morning -- the day after Justice Floyd in the UK declared three of Samsung's standard-essential patents (SEPs) invalid -- Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) ordered a retrial, scheduled for July 26, 2013, in a Samsung v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagreed on the inventiveness of expandable hoses. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
In this clip, Judge Floyd asks “if there is anything other than willful blindness that would prevent us from getting behind those statements. [read post]
