Search for: "U.S. v. Gomez"
Results 141 - 160
of 386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Gomez, ___ S.Ct. ___ (2016), the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am
Gomez, No. 14-857 (U.S.), in which a 6-3 majority held that “an unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff’s case,” thus resolving an ongoing split among the Circuits on this issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm
Background As part of a recruiting campaign for the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm
The dissenting justices characterized the holding as a narrow one, however, and suggested that a defendant eager to end a dispute (and thwart a potential class litigation) simply need tender the relief arguably due, rather than merely offer to do so (Campbell-Ewald Co. v Gomez, January 20, 2016, Ginsburg, R.). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am
Gomez, 2016 WL 228345 (U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am
Gomez, 2016 WL 228345 (U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
Gomez, a case closely watched by both sides of the class action bar, the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:38 am
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
Gomez, No. 14-857 (U.S. 1/20/16). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:11 am
The dissenting justices characterized the holding as a narrow one, however, and suggested that a defendant eager to end a dispute (and thwart a potential class litigation) simply need tender the relief arguably due, rather than merely offer to do so (Campbell-Ewald Co. v Gomez, January 20, 2016, Ginsburg, R.). [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
In a 6-3 decision, the Justices held in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:37 am
Gomez, No. 14-857, at this link. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:29 pm
Today the Supreme Court made clear in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
Gomez, No. 14-857 (U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Today the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Today the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:52 am
See Safer Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
At issue in Puerto Rico v. [read post]