Search for: "U.S. v. Parker" Results 141 - 160 of 876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
As the U.S. prepares to re-open after an unprecedented moment of pause during the COVID-19 pandemic, many people across the country have used this time for personal reflection. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Al Jazeera: “As Native peoples self-isolate, outsiders are still demanding in” CBS: “Longstanding issues put Native American communities at high COVID-19 risk” Parker Pioneer: “A look at Montana v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am by admin
  Liles Parker has published a series of articles highlighting the waivers and other actions taken by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other Federal and State agencies to ease the burden on healthcare providers during the COVID-19 public health emergency.[2]  This article is the first in a two-part series that will highlight some of the more significant provisions of the Cares Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
As a recent letter to a provider from CMS contractor Novitas Solutions stated:  “An undeliverable records request sent to the provider’s Medicare 855 correspondence address constitutes a failure to provide CMS access to documentation in violation of 42 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
As a recent letter to a provider from CMS contractor Novitas Solutions stated:  “An undeliverable records request sent to the provider’s Medicare 855 correspondence address constitutes a failure to provide CMS access to documentation in violation of 42 U.S. [read post]